data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c04d/4c04d71179255f2902d156d5cbc87b36f132254b" alt=""
It was a combination of reasons that made me switch sides, so to speak, the main one being the need to hike the resolution, which was previously 10.2MP on the Nikon, in order to achieve much bigger prints. Well, a RAW image shot at highest resolution (18MP) pulls in single exposures at a massive 50 Megabytes. All I need now is the large format printer...he he.
I've been very surprised at the quality of photos that've come out of the 7D, which uses an absolutely stuffed 18 megapixel, APS-C sized sensor. (So, there is a 1.6x crop factor.) I've printed a handful on A3 paper and the detail is outstanding.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d76e/8d76e72d6d662c02e6d8ab39a44deff49c05c0db" alt=""
With low-light photography being a favourite of mine I've been giving the camera a few tests here and there. So far, so very good. Infact, that's an understatement because the quality of images shot in almost pitch dark using a 100 ISO have been brilliant. No noise for me. The Angel shot (below) was taken in almost pitch darkness on 'Bulb' setting, using a shutter speed of almost one minute! The detail is outstanding, if I may be so bold...he he.
Mind you, I was out
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eedcf/eedcf2863d1b7bf1556f4f5325f1215240c21191" alt=""
The pro's and con's eh.
Aye well, thanks for popping over.
I'll be back again shortly.
Ash